The ongoing strike by the United Auto Workers (UAW) at Ford, General Motors (GM), and Stellantis has sent shockwaves through the US auto industry. With negotiations at a standstill and both sides remaining far apart, uncertainty has emerged as the most powerful weapon wielded by the auto workers. This article examines the potential impact of the strike, the reasons behind the UAW’s decision to strike at all three companies simultaneously, and the implications for the future of labor relations in the industry.
As negotiations continue, there are growing indications that the strike could drag on for weeks, if not longer. The UAW’s decision to launch a limited strike, taking down only one plant at each company instead of completely shutting down production, has created uncertainty. According to Harry Katz, a professor at Cornell’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations, this tactic doesn’t immediately put significant pressure on any one company but prolongs the overall uncertainty. As a result, the strike could potentially last for six to eight weeks or even longer.
While the current strike has not yet inflicted maximum pain on company profitability, it has disrupted production at three plants that manufacture midsized pickup trucks. While these trucks are profitable, they are not the biggest cash cows for the companies. Nevertheless, the lost sales are projected to result in an impact of between $41 million and $64 million in weekly operating profits, according to Deutsche Bank. From the UAW’s standpoint, the three affected plants employ approximately 12,700 workers, less than 10 percent of UAW auto workers nationwide. This limits the hit to the UAW’s strike fund, expected to decrease by an estimated $6.5 million per week.
The UAW has strategically positioned itself to escalate the strike and target facilities that would cause even more harm. Michelle Kaminski, a professor specializing in labor relations at Michigan State University, explains that the union’s approach aims to inject a high level of uncertainty into the strike magnitude, thereby increasing pressure on the companies. Labor historian Nelson Lichtenstein predicts that the UAW may add plants to the strike on a weekly basis until a deal is reached. The threat of expanding the strike is a powerful bargaining chip for the UAW.
The UAW’s demands and departure from tradition
One of the key demands of the UAW is a 40 percent wage hike that would match the increases seen by auto CEOs over the past four years. Additionally, the UAW is pushing for the elimination of different pay and benefit tiers, a cost-of-living adjustment, and the restoration of retiree medical benefits. In a departure from tradition, where the UAW typically selects a lead company to target with a strike, this time, they have chosen to strike at all three companies simultaneously. However, labor experts still expect the UAW to use the first deal reached as a template for negotiations on wages and other terms.
Analysts at Cox Automotive have identified that GM sales are “likely more vulnerable” due to their brisk sales at dealerships, especially when compared to Stellantis, which has a higher inventory due to weaker sales. Ford falls somewhere in between the other two companies. GM has acknowledged that its inventory of new and popular vehicles is currently at about 10 days, but they aim to increase it by the end of the year.
As the strike continues, uncertainty looms large over the US auto industry. The simultaneous strike by the UAW at Ford, GM, and Stellantis has disrupted production, impacted profitability, and created negotiations deadlock. With no end in sight, the battle between the auto workers and the companies shows no signs of abating. The outcome of this strike has far-reaching implications for labor relations in the industry and the future of auto manufacturing in the United States.
Leave a Reply